![]() Newer player in the market, yet to be tested over time, but exciting. Checkout Backblaze’s open source reed-solomon erasure coding One of the cheapest per Gig storage & fairly documented on working. Here are some popular options for object storage outside of flagship options: Provider ![]() There are many cheaper options other than top-tier clouds which charge 1/10th on egress but even 1/10th is still a pretty high cost when looking at Tera byte or Peta byte kind of egress. To put money where the mouth is, Cloudflare launched R2 which has zero egress charges. While I do not agree with all their points but in a broad sense they are right about AWS having a massive markup on the egress. Market for non-top-tier storage is getting hotįor the last few years, Cloudflare has been openly criticising AWS for their massive egress pricing. So now they have YouTube/FB/others sitting between them & their viewers and are on terms of those respective players w.r.t advertising. For individuals that is not a challenge but for media organisations going online, they lose direct contact with their customers. This would not make sense for the majority of content creators and hence they will simply push their content via YouTube/Facebook/Instagram. Let’s look at a simple cost calculation of say 1 million views to any video/discussion/podcast/stream of say 100MB in size. Their customers can get cheaper computing, database hosting, storage and CDN etc outside but the back & forth traffic move will have a massive impact on the bill due to egress that it’s just not worth it.Ĭost calculation of video streaming & jailed garden issue This high egress pricing acts as a lock-in feature for the top-tier cloud. This high egress pricing is not just for the storage but for most products by top tier clouds including CDN offering, egress by compute VMs etc. But for applications pulling data regularly (like streaming) it can get extremely expensive ($90/TB) In many applications (like backups) where one retrieves a fraction of uploaded data, this works well. Take e.g on AWS S3 ( pricing here) it costs $0.023/GB/month (i.e 1.9 INR/GB/month) to store data and egress is $0.09/GB/month (i.e 7.44 INR/GB/month). While the charge is a few cents/GB but at a large multi-TB scale it can get pretty expensive. Almost all players offer free ingress i.e user > cloud upload is free but cloud > user is charged. One of the dark sides of object storage since its launch has been the egress pricing. There is robust client-side library support & clients like rclone offer easy plug-and-play storage. ![]() The S3 API became popular enough that now it acts as an industry standard and now is offered by hundreds of companies including Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Backblaze, OVH & many more. The API replies with “success” on uploads only when data is replicated to multiple datacenters. Plus top tier cloud players do offer redundancy of data. No need to plan storage, no need to plan hard disk, storage servers, or rack capacity but a simple pay-as-you-go opex cost. The idea was straightforward - pay-as-go storage with a few cents/GB/month charge to store data and a few cents/GB to egress data. It became popular when Amazon Web Services (AWS) launched S3. This gives the option of simple plug-and-play horizontal scalability. ![]() For those unaware, object storage is de-facto cloud storage which stores data as objects instead of file system architecture. Last year had many interesting developments and one of that has been object storage.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |